Democracy Referenda V2 #702
| Topic | |
| Proposed Hash | 0x342bff892fb3d36a26752814edfc30e16dc1ce501f25b5c795d29eb7c1d8e640 |
| Proposer | |
| Proposer Reserved | 1 DOT |
| Decision Makers | |
| Status |  Decision |
| Actual Module | System |
| Actual Call | Remark |
| Origin | WishForChange |
| Voting Statistics |  Aye 70,101,265.31 DOT  Nay 94,614,652.0633169677 DOT |
| Parameters | [1 items 0:{3 items "name":"remark" "type":"Vec<U8>" "value":"I propose not to allow any delegations on the following tracks which should be considered of vital importance:
- Root track (could completely change the protocol)
- Wish for change track (could produce deep changes in the protocol)
- Treasurer track (unlimited spending without any cap, potentially burning the full treasury if the beneficiary address is a burn address)
The idea behind delegation is good, it's the concept that for specific actions you do not want to vote yourself but you rather trust a third party. However for things of extreme importance it is risky to trust a third party because of the well-known agent problem
Just like in your daily life you can issue a POA for a commercial contract but not for extremely important events like for example marriage / divorce / etc
Certain events are so critical that it is important to know that there is no risk that the agent might have a different opinion than the owner
This is not specifically targeted at DV (even if of course their role has to be cons...[View All] } ] |
Subscan © 2024 - Developed by Subscan Team